Sanjeeves just received a decent bonus. Nice work, Sanjeeve. He knows he could invest all of the money, but he's seen a new watch he likes. He's not worried. With his HSBC Premier bank account and access to their financial advice service, he can get a personalised plan for the future and know how much you can spend a day. Everything's Premier when your bank account is. Search HSBC Premier. HSBC UK, opening up a world of opportunity.

For financial advice, you need minimum £100,000.

Other criteria and fees apply.

Financial and other eligibility criteria apply for HSBC Premier.

At Accardo, you'll save 25% on your first shop and get free delivery.

Which means, if you were to buy a four cheese pizza, you'd basically be getting one of the cheeses for free. Save and splurge at Arcado, the online supermarket, geographical and other restrictions. Minimum spend 60 pounds and charges apply, new customers only maximum saving 20 pounds terms at Arcado.com. Donald Trump told everyone, he told you to just move on from the Epstein files, right? There's nothing to see there. Why are you being crazy? But we haven't moved on and, oh, man, is there definitely something to see there? I just wanted to ask you, have you had a chance to review any of the unredacted files over at the DOJ, the Epstein files? I did. You did? Yeah, I just came from there. What can you tell us? He's a bunch of sick. Right, so in big news, this week, lawmakers got access to a handful of secured terminals in the Department of Justice where they can examine the Epstein files totally unredacted, or at least they're supposed to be totally unredacted. Then when Rokana and Thomas Massey, they came out of there yesterday, they revealed this. There's big black screens of complete redactions. When you go in there and look on the computer, sometimes you lift off the black ink, and there's white ink redacting files.

I'd say 70 to 80% of them were redacted. The main 302 statements where survivors

talked about who raped them, all of that was still redacted.

And so when we asked the people in the room who weren't responsible for the redactions, they said, oh, we think those are how the files were given to us. Right, so they think that Trump's FBI scrubbed the files way back in March and then gave them to the DOJ attorneys who prepared them for release in November, December, and January. But the Epstein Transparency Act, it doesn't just single out those attorneys. it is very clear that the FBI as well is responsible for making all these files available.

So legally, there's no excuse for this. But then as far as the documents that were actually unredacted for the lawmakers, a lot of them apparently included stuff that shouldn't have been redacted for the public, as Jamie Raskin explained. I saw the names of lots of people who were redacted for mysterious or backgoing orcrutable reasons. For example, you had people like Leslie Wexner, the billionaire Victoria's secret tycoon,

whose close relationship to Epstein is well known.

Wexner, his name was redacted from a government document, and I couldn't understand the logic of that.

He was not a victim.

Reskin also talked about an email that Epstein received from his lawyers,

summing up a conversation they had with Trump's lawyers about the 2009 period.

Epstein's lawyers synopsized and quoted,

Trump is saying that,

that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of his club at Mar-a-Lago,

but he was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, and he had never been asked to leave.

And that was redacted for some indeterminate, inscrutable reason.

Representative Bekha Belind actually told DropSight knew something similar about a document that she read.

One was related to whether or not Trump, you know, had ever kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago, as he claimed.

...