Where do you find a clear signal in a world of static?

In a time of rapid change cut through the noise.

The Economist goes beyond the headlines to decode the forces shaping today and defining tomorrow.

Get the full story.

It's more than news.

It's a trusted global perspective.

The Economist know which way is up.

Hey, Anna, I've got a new secret weapon for print. Print. Vista print, right? That's not a secret. Print everything for your business with Vista print. Business cards, stickers, t-shirt, signage, even photo books from your last holiday. If you need it, we print it at vistoprint.co.com. This Trump-Epstein email scandal has gotten crazier and crazier. I mean, the floodgates blew open last night. Or because yesterday morning, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, they released three emails that they obtained from Jeffrey Epstein's estate. And those included bits where Epstein called Trump the dog that has embarked at a victim since reported to be Virginia Joufrey spent hours in my house with him and said about Trump, Of course he knew about the girls as he asked Galane to stop. But also in response to the committee's Republicans claiming, hey, those emails were selectively chosen, redacted and taken out of context. And well, now they dumped the entire 23,000 documents drove from the estate, but rather than exonerating Trump, they just make him look much, much worse. worse. Right, so let's go through these revelations one by one, though I will say first. Epstein, really awful at grammar. It's like every casual boomer email I've ever seen it. Typo's galore. He doesn't capitalize the right letter. Punctuation's all over the place. But as far as stuff that actually matters, probably the biggest bombshell to come out from this latest drop, is an Epstein written in February of 2019. Right? Because apparently he's referring to the sexual abuse of underage girls and he wrote, Trump knew of it and came to my house many times during that period. He never got a massage. Also in 2015, Epstein emailed a then New York Times reporter, would you like photos of Donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen? Though there despite replying yes, the reporter says that he never actually got those photos. But he did get an anecdote with Epstein suggesting people should quote, Ask My Houseman about Donald almost walking through the door, leaving his nose print on the glass as young women were swimming in the pool and he was so focused he walked straight into the door. Many of the emails were also just packed full of vicious insults that Epstein had for Trump, with him, for example, telling the same reporter, he feels alone and is nuts. I told everyone from day one, evil beyond belief, mad, and most thought I was speaking metaphorically. It's obvious he could crack. Stormy Daniels, lies after lies after lies. Then in a 2018 exchange with the author Michael Wolfe, Epstein referred to dopey Donald and demented Donald, saying that his finances were all a sham. In the year before, when someone called Trump so gross, Epstein replied, worse in real life and up close. Into the conversation with Larry Summers, Epstein once called Trump borderline insane. When Summers asked whether Trump would crack into insanity, Epstein said his strength is remarkable. He has pounded 24-7. I hope someone close to him gets indicted, but not sure. Otherwise, the pressure of the unknown will force him to do crazy things. And Epstein saying at another point, your world does not understand how dumb he really is. He will blame everyone around him for bad results. Also in late 2018, though it's unclear what the context is. Someone emailed Epstein, it will all blow over. They're really just trying to take down Trump and doing whatever they can to do that. To which, the famed billionaire pedophile replied, it's wild because I am the one able to take him down. And well, that is pretty much it for the insult. There's also a lot of really interesting stuff to grab onto here. here with for example, the modeling agency co-founder Faith Kate's asking Epstein in 2017, where he was spending Thanksgiving, and then later asking, who else is down there to which Epstein replied, David Faisal, Hansen, Trump. In the year before, during an exchange with a member's only club founder, Jenny Enterprise, Epstein said that he spent Thanksgiving in Palm with the Trump crowd. Or with that one, not necessarily meaning Donald Trump himself, though the first email certainly seems like it. And that would be really standout because that appears to contradict Trump's claim that he broke off contact with Epstein after 2004. Though also, as you may have guessed from some of the other emails, they don't appear to have, you know, been friendly even if that was true. And in fact, The email showed that Epstein was frequently working with his associates to dig up dirt on Trump,

though the reasons weren't clear. Or with him in 2012, suggesting that his lawyer investigate Trump's finances, including the mortgage on Mar-a-Lago and a $30 million loan that Epstein said Trump had received. Also in 2019, one of Epstein's advisors apparently went through Trump's federal financial disclosure form, which he called 100 pages of nonsense and emailed Epstein 9 interesting findings.

No is including information about the went through Trump's federal financial disclosure form, which he called 100 pages of nonsense and emailed Epstein 9 interesting findings.

Those including information about the president's foundation, businesses, and assets.

Also another email that's gotten some attention is one between Epstein and a top European official that was written in June of 2018,

notably one month before Trump met Vladimir Putin in Helsinki.

And Epstein suggested that the official tell Putin that Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, could get insight on Trump by talking to me. And adding that Vitali Turk and Russia's then ambassador to the United Nations used to, but he died. With Epstein then elaborating on the insight he could provide saying, it is not complex. He must be seen to get something. It's that simple. Also in another exchange with former White House counsel, Catherine Roomler in 2018, they discussed Michael Cohen, who admitted to conspiring with Trump to pay Stormy Daniels-Hush money. But with Epstein saying, you see, I know how dirty Donald is. My guess is that non-lawyers, New York biz people have no idea what it means to have your fixer flip. And y'all, I mean, there is so much more. We've got emails between Epstein and former Prince Andrew,

Woody Allen's wife, Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel, tons of people. There's really just so much more we could go through. But of course, the main spotlight right now is on the revelations about Epstein and Trump, though there are varying responses here. Right, of course, you have Democrats saying a lot of this is concerning, appears to shed a light on a lot, you know, really playing them up, but they're also accusing the GOP of dumping so many documents at once to distract from the few specific things that look really bad. Or the idea being that instead of letting the Democrats drip feed these emails to the press, Republicans can kind of just rip off the band-aid. But also the Republicans, they counter that all the other documents are the real point, and the focus on Trump is the real distraction. And you even that Trump himself, posting on truth social, the Democrats are trying to bring up the Jeffrey Epstein hoax again, because they'll do anything at all to deflect on how badly they've done on the shutdown and so many other subjects. Only a very bad or stupid Republican would fall into that trap. The Democrats cost our country $1.5 trillion with their recent antics of viciously closing our country, while at the same time, putting many at risk, and they should pay a fair price. There should be no deflections to Epstein or anything else, and any Republicans involved should be focused only on opening up our country and fixing the massive damage caused by the Democrats. But then with that, you have people asking, well, okay, if this is just a nonsense distraction, then it doesn't explain why he's apparently been scrambling to prevent any more of the Epstein files from getting out. Right, I mean, his top White House officials had meetings with Representatives, Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace yesterday, reportedly trying to persuade them to take their names off the discharge petition. But the petition it passed yesterday, setting in motion the process, that'll end with a floor vote in the House whether to make Trump release the Epstein files. So with all this, I do want to know that both Bobert and Mace defended Trump when asked about the meetings.

The president has not forced me to do anything. The president has not put pressure on me.

I was not asked by the president to remove my name.

Every conversation that I had was welcomed and very civil.

And, you know, it's okay for people

to have discussions about things that are going on with our nation.

I am deeply frustrated with the press.

All this focus on Trump, who's been exonerated by the Epstein victims and were not focused

...