Hi.

Hello, everybody. I'm Jesse Waters, along with Paul Morrow, Jessica Gattarlov, Dana Perino, and Greg Gutfeld.

It's 5 o'clock in New York City, and this is the 5.

It's all going down Saturday for Trump's big, beautiful ceasefire.

The White House confirming J.D. Vance is taking the lead in talks with the Iranian

negotiators in Islamabad this weekend.

Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, they'll also be there.

This comes after President Trump made the mullahes cry uncle, agreeing to a two-week

ceasefire, but only if they open the Strait of Ramos. Meanwhile, the libs are still crashing

out over that Trump truth, where he casually threatened that a whole civilization will die.

But Caroline had to spell it out for him.

Why is it appropriate for the President of the United States to use that kind of language

when talking about civilian targets?

Well, I understand the questions about the President's rhetoric, but what the President

cares most about is results.

How can the President claim that America can ever have the moral high ground if he's

threatening to destroy civilizations?

The President absolutely has the moral high ground over the's threatening to destroy civilizations. The president absolutely has the

moral high ground over the Iranian terrorist regime, and for you to even suggest otherwise is

frankly insulting. What was your understanding of what he meant when he said this civilization is

going to be eliminated? I think it was a very, very strong threat from the president of the United States

that led the Iranian regime to cave to their knees and ask for a ceasefire

...