We have a new development in Trump's 10 billion lawsuit against the American people through the IRS.

According to the New York Times, the IRS is reportedly in settlement talks with Trump.

The stunning thing about this is not only that they may actually pay Trump or waive audits against him,

but they are doing so in the moment that the judge

says that she may not even be able to take this case under the Constitution. My name is

Dina Dahl with the Midas Touch Network. Let's get into this. Now, Judge Kathleen Williams from the

Southern District of Florida, an Obama appointee, raised this issue, whether or not

Trump could actually sue the IRS under the Constitution, because, of course, Trump appointed

the head of the IRS, the Secretary of Treasury, Scott Besant. And so is there even an adverse conflict? Now, under the

Constitution, in order for a court to take the case, the court has to have subject matter

constitution. They have to have a case or controversy under Article 3 of the Constitution.

Now, there's two different types of jurisdictions that a

court has to have to take a case. One is personal jurisdiction. Do they have jurisdiction over you?

Do you live in the location that the court has jurisdiction of over as a company doing business

in that area? And then also subject matter jurisdiction. Is this the type

of subject that this particular court can oversee? For example, the Supreme Court is probably going to

use subject matter jurisdiction to deny the Democrats request to take the Virginia redistricting case.

They're going to say that this is a state issue and they don't

have subject matter jurisdiction over it. That's probably going to be their argument unless there's

some sort of shocking great news that we don't expect. But here in this case, the judge is saying

there is no actual adverse conflict. So I don't have subject matter jurisdiction over this.

Basically, if you are trying to sue yourself, you shouldn't be in court. Go ahead and pay yourself

...