Good evening tonight, the evolving reactions to the reporting by the Washington Post published

last night around this time, some 24 hours ago, the Post reported that FBI agents recovered

a document from Mar-a-Lago describing a foreign country's nuclear capabilities.

CNN has yet to confirm the post-reporting.

That said, when reached by the Washington Post for comment and attorney for the former

president did not deny the substance of it, instead, he said something that we've now

started hearing a lot from defenders of the former president in the last 24 hours.

Deflecting on the facts, focusing instead on the leaks.

For example, here's Senator Marco Rubio, who serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee

this past Sunday, explaining why the FBI recovering highly classified documents at Mar-a-Lago

is a storage argument.

This is really at his core a storage argument that they're making, right?

They're arguing there are documents there.

They don't deny that he should have access to those documents.

I don't think a fight over storage of documents is worthy of what they've done.

Well, now that the Washington Post published their report about nuclear secrets, perhaps

being involved, Senator Rubio and others are focusing more of their argument on apparent

leaks.

That doesn't seem like the kind of thing you should have in your post-presidential desk

drawer.

Well, let's break this down.

First of all, again, we really don't know, because let's go back and understand that

...