Springs blooming at Starbucks.

A new season calls for new discoveries,

like our iced Ube-Vinilla Machilate.

Smooth, creamy and nutty, balanced with notes of vanilla.

It's a treat for the ice too,

with vibrant lilac hues to brighten your spring mood.

Hot or iced, there are so many ways to love this stunning

serve. Uber vanilla, pouring now at Starbucks. Subject to availability while stocks last. Judicial restraint

in the United States Supreme Court? Well, the Supreme Court seems to be allergic to that concept,

but we're going to find out where the rubber meets the road this week at oral argument at the United States Supreme Court seems to be allergic to that concept. But we're going to find out where the rubber

meets the road this week at oral argument at the United States Supreme Court. First time in

100 years, they're going to be deciding whether the 14th Amendment and the Citizenship Clause

says, means what it says, that people born in the United States, regardless of who their parents are, or what

status they have, are U.S. citizens. It's called birthright citizenship for a reason, and Donald

Trump tried to change it with an executive order just hours after taking office in January of 2025.

It should be clear and simple based on the express language of the 14th Amendment.

Yet here we are. How will Chief Justice Roberts navigate this? Will they use a principle of

judicial restraint? There's a 1940 statute recodified by Congress in 1952 that is right on point.

And all the Supreme Court has to do is rule that the executive order by Donald Trump violates the federal congressional statute, the 1940 law, which defines citizenship directly

from language of the 14th Amendment that was recodified by Congress in 1952, and you're done.

You can get into the niceties of what the commas mean and the parentheticals and other things mean in the 14th Amendment.

Or you can just use judicial restraint, Chief Justice Roberts, and declare that this executive order can't overturn the will of Congress.

...