This is Michael Popoc, Legal A.F. Mark Meadows trying to get out of the vice-like grip of the Georgia prosecutor and the criminal case in Georgia against him, where he's not going to get a plea deal, and he's going to trial trial has been trying to get to federal court

for many many months now and now it's coming to a head at the 11th Circuit

Court of Appeals sitting in Georgia.

We just got the three judge panel that's been assigned randomly to the case.

And it's not great for Mark Meadows, but it's a great day for justice.

Let me tell you what's going on.

I'll tell you about the three judges

that have been assigned to the case oral argument on the 15th of December and then are

ruling a month or two after that. What's the issue that's up on appeal?

Was Mark Meadows operating within the color

of his federal office as a White House chief of staff

when, as the indictment alleges, he interfered with the Georgia election, not only on the phone

when he made the phone call and arranged the phone call with Donald Trump in to call the Secretary of State of Georgia the most perfect phone

call in which they ask the Secretary of State to go find 11,758 votes, but Mark Meadows going to different places in Georgia trying to convince

State House members and election officials and members of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to let him interfere

and try to find votes for Donald Trump, throw out absentee ballots, get involved with election

fraud, all on the dirty hands of Mark Meadows.

And the question is, all the things that's been alleged against him in the indictment.

Are they within the outer boundaries of the color of his office or are they just crimes for

which he was not operating wearing that hat as a chief of staff I mean chief of

staff has a job description. The problem is Mark Meadows

doesn't know what the job description is as he testified before a federal judge

...