We got some breaking and developing news in the Ibrago Garcia case.

He's waging a fight for his life on two fronts, one in a criminal case in Tennessee,

one in a civil liberties case in Maryland.

We've got some developments in both, starting with Judge Crenshaw in Tennessee,

is effectively gagged, Pam Bondi, the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and everybody

else not named Donald Trump, from continuing to talk about the case in the media violating

his Abrago-Garcia's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial. This is where there's a tension

between the First Amendment and the Sixth Amendment. You have a First Amendment right in general, but it is subordinate to the Sixth Amendment right

of a criminal defendant presumed innocent to a fair trial.

And so certain things that you say out loud, and I've got the receipts, I've got the clips,

you can say generally, but you can't say when you're a prosecutor or you're on the other side of a case against a criminal defendant, plain and simple. So we see a balancing act by Judge

Crenshaw. At the same time, he wants to get to the bottom of indiscovery, meaning the documents

provided by the government, as to why Abrago Garcia's being in was indicted at all.

Why how did it go as the judge put it from deport him, but don't prosecute him to prosecute him

and then deport him who made that decision? I want to see the emails. What about the missing lawyers?

The lawyers who were fired or walked out the door.

The judge in camera, meaning in his own review,

wants to see documents drafted by Ben Schrader,

who walked off the case because he refused to indict the Abrago Garcia.

He wants to see all the Ben Schrader documents right away.

And then in Maryland, Judge Zinnis is getting to the bottom of why he's being sent,

why Abrago Garcia is being sent to Liberia of all places.

...