The president of fertilization, as Donald Trump calls himself, and Elon Musk, the world's worst baby daddy, apparently have colluded and gotten together and think it's a good idea to start paying women to have babies.

Here's the headline. Trump mulls over a $5,000 baby bonus for moms in a bid to

reverse declining birth rates report. And here is what I have to say about that. This is anonymous.

I want to just piggyback on him. Trump considering a $5,000 baby bonus to encourage birth. Meanwhile, it costs an average of

$10,000 to $18,000 to give birth baby expense range from $1,100 to $2,500 monthly, not including rent, food,

insurance, and other necessities. This angers me to the core of my being because it goes back to the

childless cat lady that women should have

babies. That's what they're designed to do. And here's what I have to say. If you want people to

have babies, provide child care help. Provide housing help. Do not cut Medicaid and Social Security.

Provide insurance. $5,000 is not going to fix anything.

And I think it's insulting that nobody is looking at all the problems that this administration

is creating and they're thinking, oh, throw $5,000 out of it. It infuriates me.

This is where we have to be a tad bit careful because Kamala did campaign on something similar

and it's a child tax credit.

And she talked about people that are when they have babies for the first time, the government

giving them assistance.

And so we have to be careful that when they say something, we're not just 100% against it because it came

from them, because Democrats typically want to support young families and children. And so I support,

if you have a child, you're getting a $5,000 tax credit. I think that is really good policy. It proves when we invest in babies, when we

invest in families, it helps people immensely. Where I think this gets a little bit blurry is

it's guised with them that they want women to be at home.

And I think their motivation is probably to keep women out of the workforce.

...