Trooper 2 Step Exceptions

Street Cop Podcast

Street Cop Training

Education

4.9 • 967 Ratings

🗓️ 19 December 2021

⏱️ 16 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this archive episode, Dennis explains a few circumstances where the Trooper 2 Step is not necessarily required to gain lawful entry. Recorded on 11/07/2020. Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled that in a case involving a consent search, knowledge of a right to refuse consent is a factor in determining whether a grant of consent to a search was voluntary, the state does not need to prove that the person who granted consent to search knew of the right to refuse consent under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that decided that a warrantless arrest in public and consenting to a vehicle search did not violate the Fourth Amendment. If you like what you are hearing and want to stay in the loop with the latest in Street Cop Training, please follow our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/StreetCopTraining

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	One,
0:02.0	the one, yeah.
0:05.0	H-I-O-W-Wah. H-Wah.
0:08.0	You trying to be a street cop?
0:10.0	Alright, happy to say it everybody. a little bit of a lagged delay.
0:14.4	I did a video yesterday regarding Ohio v Robinette, United 60 Watson and Schlingclot versus Bustamante.
0:20.0	Three important US Supreme Court cases and it's good to know because what we're seeing
0:25.3	is people who are having a misunderstanding of what they need to do to gain lawful consent.
0:30.2	The first thing I want to tell you is this. I want to make sure that I communicate this in a way that is really at the highest level in regard to respect to everybody else who's an instructor in this field.
0:43.7	We have no interest ever in slinging mud towards other people.
0:47.1	It's not the way we do things. We don't like when it's done to us, so we don't do it like that, right?
0:51.0	And I implore you to take that position in anything that you do
0:55.4	talking bad or trying to even remotely come off in a wrong way is a hard way to go about doing
1:01.8	things Brian Buck. Hello, how are you buddy? So let's go over this thing. So often I will see people
1:11.4	performing consent procedures on motor vehicle stop
1:15.4	center that are not required.
1:17.4	It's important for you to find out if your state requires it.
1:19.8	So I'm going to read Ohio to start.
1:21.3	We're going to talk what that means. And what
1:22.8	some states have said, not many, not a foreign majority, but very few minority, what some
1:26.7	states have said regarding gaining lawful consent. So we've got to Robnet for a second.
1:31.6	Robinette said this,
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Street Cop Training, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Street Cop Training and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.