Triple Bank Shot

Divided Argument

Will Baude & Dan Epps

Constitution, Constitutional Law, News, Law, Politics, Supreme Court, Government, Legal System, Supreme Court Of The United States, U.s. Supreme Court, Scotus, Supreme Court Justice

4.9 • 676 Ratings

🗓️ 18 June 2021

⏱️ 81 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Will and Dan break down the Court's sudden burst of interesting opinions – California v. Texas, Fulton v. Philadelphia, and Nestle v. Doe.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Oh, yay.
0:02.0	Oh, yay.
0:03.2	The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.
0:08.0	Unless there is any more question to be able to find an argument in this case.
0:10.8	All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to give their attention.
0:19.3	Welcome, the divided argument, an unscheduled, unap predictable Supreme Court podcast.
0:24.0	I'm Will Bode.
0:24.9	And I'm Dan Epps.
0:26.0	So this is a big week, Will.
0:28.5	We got some opinions.
0:29.6	Oh, yeah, I was thinking about something else.
0:30.7	I was thinking about the fact that we have divided argument merchandise now.
0:34.6	That's more important.
0:35.3	Yeah, check that out.
0:36.1	We've got T-shirts, mugs, stuff like that.
0:39.4	It's on our website, store.dividedargument.com or just go to divided argument. But I think you
0:44.0	were talking about something else. You were talking about opinions. So we did get some, right?
0:48.1	I think so. A couple we should talk about it. What do we get? We got, we've been getting all these boring, unanimous, nine-o cases, not the ones we're
0:56.3	looking for. And then we finally seem to have gotten some of the ones we've been looking for.
1:01.4	To some degree, kind of surprisingly, and maybe we'll talk about that in a minute. Where should we
1:06.2	start? We got recording this on Thursday, June 17th. We got three fairly significant opinions. Where do we start with those?
1:14.1	So I think we have to start with the Affordable Care Act case. For the third time in our past 10 years, the Supreme Court did not invalidate or effectively hamstring the Affordable Care Act. And strangely, that seems to be news.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Will Baude & Dan Epps, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Will Baude & Dan Epps and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.