So, guys, Derek, more plates more days.com.

Today we're going to be talking about the new guidelines for transgender participation

and the findings in terms of do they indeed retain an advantage in female sport

because this is something before that it was claimed that they had no advantage.

And if they just inhibited their testosterone in some aspects,

even if it was to the degree that

they have three times higher testosterone levels than a biological female, then it would be fine

and everything would be good.

And there was no issue if they had internal testes or anything like this.

It was just whatever.

There was no advantage whatsoever.

Now, obviously, this has incited significant amounts

of debate and a lot of uproar for certain individuals that are allowed to compete in certain

sports, other sports that are not allowing people to compete. People are getting kicked out

when they discover certain things about them as far as like how they're made up, their genetic

makeup and whatnot. Actual structural far as like how they're you know made up their genetic makeup and whatnot

um actual like structural aberrations in how they fucking developed as humans throughout puberty

because some of them are um sort of like they if you have internal testes like that's not

necessary that's kind of a you know like a hard thing to wrap your head around if that's

like fair or not when you are, are you born just a genetic advantage? On the other hand,

you have a structural fucking mechanism of producing testosterone that another individual doesn't have.

So is that like, you know, there's obviously a significant amount of debate around the topic

...