What does it come to when it takes a conservative MP to speak more sense on issues of

war and peace, of saving human life, on injustice, then not just the conservative leadership,

but the labor leadership as well.

Now this I'm afraid is currently the timeline we're living in,

the most hellish of all the timelines.

Let's just listen now to the conservative MP Crispin Blunt speak, huge amounts of good sense.

He is the former chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee.

The United Kingdom Government has given unequivocal support to the state of Israel a statements repeated by the Prime Minister yesterday

and I'm uncertain that they fully understand the implications of the development of

international law whereby if you the war crime, you become complicit in that crime itself.

And it's absolutely clear now that what is happening in Gaza does amount to a war crime because it is disproportionate and it does not distinguish the

targets it is taking out. Hence a terrible number of children that have been killed and what we just heard from the

World Health Organization and the concerns about the effect of the transfer on the hospitals.

But you will know you will know that a force transfer of 1.2 million people is an absolute crime under the laws of war.

You are simply not allowed to do it. As indeed is the collective

punishment of the people of Gaza with a siege and the imposition of no food

and no water and no electors. Now this is the moral clarity, which is missing from a labor leadership, which justified cutting

off water and energy to a civilian population, and refused to condemn other war crimes such

as the forcible expulsion of a civilian population.

And what does it come to when this is like coming up for air?

When all he's actually doing is stating a basic legal position,

is not simply a humanitarian position, a legal,

...