Tom Fitton's Weekly Update -- June 19, 2020
Tom Fitton's Weekly Update Podcast
Judicial Watch
4.8 • 2K Ratings
🗓️ 20 June 2020
⏱️ 59 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The reason he was writing the memos was to create a record so that he could destroy |
| 0:09.0 | no American knowingly colluded with the Russians to interfere in our election |
| 0:14.1 | cameras. Oh wait, unless you mean Hillary Clinton. |
| 0:17.7 | Pardon, prosecutions, and transparency. You're listening to Tom Fitton's weekly update here on J.W. TalkVac. |
| 0:31.5 | Hey everyone, judicial watch President Tom Fitton here |
| 0:34.3 | with our weekly update here on social media. |
| 0:36.3 | Thanks for joining us this week. |
| 0:37.7 | Well, Washington, D.C. is still on lockdown, |
| 0:40.9 | but there's a lot going on. |
| 0:42.1 | Our Supreme Court has gone rogue on certain issues. I'll talk about that, both on anti-discrimination issues and on the core issue of our nation's sovereignty and the right of the president to control immigration under law. |
| 0:58.0 | Completely outrageous decisions in both areas. So I'll give you my reaction there. We have some interesting information that I've |
| 1:07.4 | been meeting to share with you, but because of Facebook's recent censorship issues |
| 1:12.0 | targeting the president, I thought it was important to |
| 1:14.4 | raise now, about who's involved with Facebook and you won't be surprised to find out |
| 1:21.0 | the big name behind their new censorship board, or at least the big |
| 1:25.0 | name behind many of the people on the censorship board that Facebook is |
| 1:30.3 | running. And of course we still have the continued crisis with the insurrection. is a few views on that as well. The first up is the rule of law crisis caused by out of |
| 1:45.6 | control Supreme Court decisions in the last week. We had two decisions come down, |
| 1:50.9 | one related to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Title VII provision that |
| 1:56.7 | prohibits discrimination because of race and sex and other immutable characteristics and the Supreme Court was considering the issue as to whether or not |
| 2:10.0 | being either a homosexual or transgender fit the definition of sex under the law. |
| 2:21.6 | Now if you're a common sense type person like I am you would |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Judicial Watch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Judicial Watch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

