You're listening to the Judicial Watch weekly update with Tom Fitt.

Hey everyone Judicial Watch president Tom Fitt in here with our weekly update on social media busy week here at Judicial Watch.

We're in trial trying to uphold the rule of law in California.

I'll talk about that big Supreme Court or arguments this week on the abortion menace.

I'll talk about that and new lawsuit related to CRT.

On behalf of a teacher who was fired for daring to criticize it.

Plus we're seeking to find out the truth about the racist interview policy of Chicago mayor Lightfoot.

We're seeking to question her under oath.

Plus we have new secret service records about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal you want to want to find out about.

So there's a lot going on this week. I don't even know where to begin.

I guess I'll begin with the Supreme Court argument this week over the abortion issue.

The Supreme Court for those of you who have been awake have been is considering frankly whether it's who overturned the Roe versus Wade decision which essentially legalized abortion throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy abortion on demand.

And now the Supreme Court is considering a challenge to that ruling through a Mississippi law that prohibits and large measure abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy.

Judicial Watch filed an amicus brief many amicus briefs for filed as you might imagine asking the court to overturn Roe versus Wade.

You know in our view is first of all the rule law should prevail the Constitution should prevail and the Constitution doesn't mention abortion.

And this is an essentially police power that the states have that in past history states have been allowed to regulate abortion and to balance the right to life of the unborn human being versus the alleged liberty interests of the pregnant mother.

And the Roe versus Wade decision blew all that up and in my view and the view of Judicial Watch and the view of many others the Supreme Court should write the constitutional wrong and not and take a step back from acting as a super legislative body and restore the federalist principle that the states have a right to regulate abortion and allow the states to take steps forward.

Because not all states will do this, but many states will to start to protect in more aggressive ways the rights and the humanity of unborn human beings.

Judicial Watch wrote in its amicus brief far from creating a national consensus Roe threw the states into a 48 year contentious legal battle.

Even some abortion advocates like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is the deceased Supreme Court Justice,

Ashu the Injudicious method of federalizing abortion as short circuiting and naturally evolving jurisprudence under state laws as federal and state judges attempt to apply this court's precedence, which are kind of all over the place, a national landscape of inconsistent and conclusive on untenable rules have emerged as a national policy abortion jurisprudence is in a word of mess.

Stubbornly holding onto an unconstitutional precedent will never have a positive outcome.

...