Tina Peters - GUILTY…Of Doing Her Job?!
Untamed Nation
The Untamed Truth
4.6 • 1.4K Ratings
🗓️ 14 August 2024
⏱️ 73 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
This afternoon, Joe and David focused on the Tina Peters trial and the verdict reached by a jury of her peers. They pointed out that the judge has a track record of being corrupt and highlighted how Tina was ultimately prevented from presenting all the evidence that would have aided her case and proven her innocence.
The pair then welcomed guest Rachel Alexander to the show to discuss the Tina Peters trial and how, in Rachel's opinion, the trial was rigged against Tina from the start due to the judge and prosecution abusing the rule of relevance. This allowed them to prevent the admission of crucial evidence in court.
Joe and David ended the show with a message about how "we the people" must continue to fight for patriots like Tina Peters and concluded with a prayer.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | going to be having a conversation today mostly around judicial corruption and specifically the case against |
| 0:08.7 | Tina Peters. Yesterday we witnessed the final kind of peace to the travesty unfolding in Colorado's justice system. |
| 0:16.9 | Tina Peters was found guilty for her work trying to back up election results in Mesa County |
| 0:21.9 | Colorado as a county clerk. |
| 0:25.2 | Rachel Alexander, who's a both a prosecuting attorney and a journalist now. She was a |
| 0:32.1 | DA in Arizona will join us to tell us more about what she observed. You know, David, I'm going to put something up here in a second, but you're a prosecuting attorney. Rachel is a prosecuting attorney. |
| 0:53.0 | I have a retired judge that watched the case, |
| 0:56.2 | that is friends of mine, by the way, |
| 0:57.8 | one of the people that told me never to call him again |
| 0:59.9 | after November of 2020 when I came forward |
| 1:02.2 | with about the information of Eric |
| 1:03.8 | Cooper. Two other prosecuting attorneys who I literally paid to watch the trial |
| 1:15.7 | personally just so I could find out where the appealable errors would would be. So all of them, all of them last night said or what you know the the judge said Joe I can't I don't know what I just watched |
| 1:30.6 | One of the attorneys for Tina Peters was a previous retired judge and no one has ever |
| 1:38.6 | seen a case go this way. What say you? It's the same thing that we've been talking about for years. People don't |
| 1:48.8 | believe us. When we say that the judiciary is captured, this is a perfect example. |
| 1:55.0 | There were at least a dozen, at least a dozen automatic reversible error mistakes made by the judge. |
| 2:05.0 | And so these are things that if you look at black letter law, you never comment on the guilt |
| 2:09.6 | or innocence of the accused. |
| 2:12.0 | The attorneys know that you can't do that. |
| 2:14.0 | The judge at more than one point |
| 2:16.0 | commented about the guilt of Tina Peters. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Untamed Truth, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Untamed Truth and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.