meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Philosophy Bites

Timothy Williamson on Vagueness

Philosophy Bites

Nigel Warburton

Education, Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.52K Ratings

🗓️ 13 August 2007

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Philosopher Timothy Williamson explains how we can make sense of such vague concepts as 'heap' or 'red' or 'bald' in the process outlining his own solution to what are usually known as Sorites Paradoxes. Williamson gives a precise account of what 'vagueness' means, how it differs from ambiguity, and why this matters.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is philosophy bites with me David Edmonds and me Nigel Warburton.

0:07.0

Philosophy bites is available at W.

0:09.0

What does a man who's losing his hair officially become bald?

0:15.8

What hour or minute or second does one become middle aged?

0:19.4

When does a number of grains of sand become a heap?

0:22.2

These questions are all linked to a set of

0:23.9

paradoxes known as sorieties paradoxes. The name sorieties is from the Greek word

0:29.1

Soros meaning heap. They occur because many concepts like Heap are vague. The very definite Tim Williamson,

0:36.1

professor at Oxford University, is a leading expert on vagueness.

0:40.3

Tim Williamson, welcome to Philosophy Bites.

0:43.0

Hello.

0:45.0

The topic we're going to focus on today is vagueness,

0:48.0

a topic that philosophers have discussed for several thousand years.

0:51.0

I wonder if we could just open by saying what vagueness is.

0:54.0

Vagueness has to do with borderline cases.

0:58.0

For example, the word red is vague because there are some shades between red and orange where it's just not clear

1:07.4

whether to count them as red or not.

1:11.4

It's not the same thing as un-informativeness or un-specificity. For example, if you

1:17.4

ask me how many people were at a party and I say that there were at least three people and at most two hundred and ninety seven

1:26.4

that's a very un informative answer but it's not really vague because it's quite

1:32.0

clear in what circumstances it's true and in what

1:35.8

circumstances it's false.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nigel Warburton, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Nigel Warburton and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.