Welcome back. It's time for a quick bit clip. The full episode will be linked in the description,

but this is the quick bit clip to keep you in the loop for everything that's happening on the

live stream channel. Let's get into it. We're going to go to the TikTok sidekick case first for all

of you that are like, Emily, what are we even talking about? I've got you. This case is adjacent

to the Coburger prosecution where a psychic on TikTok accused a professor at the University of Idaho

of carrying out the quadruple homicide and not just carrying out the quadruple homicide, but having a teacher-student relationship

with one of the victims of an intimate and inappropriate relationship when you are the teacher and they are the student, amongst other things.

So the professor did what people being defamed do on the internet and sent a

cease and desist. How does that normally go? When you send a content creator a cease and desist,

you know, eight times out of ten, it's going to become content. And that's exactly what happened.

Remember, the attorney for the professor called it a clout circus in a footnote at one point, right?

So sent to cease and desist.

The cease and desist became content.

It became clear that the TikToker, who no longer has a TikTok account, was going to double down.

And so the TikToker doubled down and said, you know, more, more, more, accusing the professor

of murder and violating her ethics as a professor at the university, et cetera. And then the professor

sued because a cease and desist is a shot across the bow, right? It is a warning, warning,

if we do not change course, there is going to be a lawsuit.

Suit in federal court. Ticktokker decided to self-represent. That's been going well.

And so the Ticktokker decided to represent herself in federal court in Idaho and lost a summary

judgment motion. So lost the summary judgment motion, which means that the

court determined that the defamation did happen or was proven enough that the TikToker could be

...