at 7 o'clock p.m. Eastern exclusively here on Rumbull, the free speech alternative to YouTube.

Tonight, if I had to pick the most direct and explicit legislative abridgment over the last

decade of core constitutional rights, and likely be the wildly expanded definition

of quote anti-Semitism that was just court incorporated into federal anti-discrimination law last

week we examined that bill in detailed but a close second perhaps even the

top threat to court constitutional rights would be the extraordinary for sale and

or banning of Tik-Toc that President Biden signed into law last month.

The likelihood that TikTok's corporate parents can divest themselves in accordance with the

law and in the time period set is extremely low, which means that this app voluntarily, voluntarily

used by more than 150 million Americans will be banned and that

banning would take place in January of 2025, conveniently set right after the presidential

election to ensure nobody is held accountable for this visible assault on free speech.

In a federal court earlier today, both Tik-Tok and its parent company Bight Dance filed

suit against the Biden administration, arguing at length why this bill constitutes a grave and

glaring violation of the First Amendment free speech

rights of American citizens as well as the 14th Amendment and other secondary arguments.

Now there's been all kinds of fear-mongering generated about Tik-Tok to justify it.

This Fear campaign is always the foundation of any authoritarian act.

You have to put the population enough fear

to make them agree to anything that is being done in the name of protecting them from this new threat.

But so much of these fear campaigns, and certainly this one, are based on exaggerations or outright fabrications.

And the arguments made by Tik-Tok today... or outright fabrications.

...