It's Thursday, November 13, 2025. I'm Albert Mueller, and this is the briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a Christian worldview.

As you know, we're living through a collision of worldviews. We're also living through a revolution in morality. And one of the ways that

revolution moves forward is by changing an argument. So when a major argument changes, we need to

pay attention. And we now see the argument for abortion rights changing before our eyes. It appears

in what was released just in the last few hours by the editorial

board of the New York Times. It's an official editorial board statement entitled,

Abortion has remained mostly accessible that may soon change. So that is intended to get the

attention of the liberal readers of the New York Times, which is itself a very liberal newspaper, which is

situated in a very liberal city. And so when we talk about social liberalism and liberal

worldviews, being concentrated on the coast, being concentrated in cities, in cosmopolitan centers,

well, that defines New York City. So here's where we should expect this kind of

argument to emerge. But when it does emerge, we have better pay attention to it. The editors of the

New York Times look back to the reversal of the Roe decision in 2002's Dobbs decision. And they say,

even though lamentably, this reversed of the nationwide ruling for abortion by the Supreme Court in the Roe v.

Way decision of 1973.

Even so, abortion has basically remained accessible.

And they say there are two reasons for that.

One is that there is still a network nationwide of abortion access, and that means that even

if you're in a pro-life state, you can probably get to a pro-abortion state in order to get an

abortion. But the biggest game changer has been so-called medication abortion, that is the

abortion pill. And the newspaper is warning here that it just might be that

the Trump administration would try to restrict the abortion pill. And it is important to note that

...