Thu. 10/01 - The Earth Does NOT Have a Black Hole Inside It... Right?
Cool Stuff Daily
Reggie Risseeuw and Marques Pfaff
4.6 • 739 Ratings
🗓️ 1 October 2020
⏱️ 20 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Ready to launch your business? Get started with the commerce platform made for entrepreneurs. |
| 0:04.8 | Shopify is specially designed to help you start, run and grow your business with easy customizable themes that let you build your brand. |
| 0:12.5 | Marketing tools that get your products out there. Integrated shipping solutions that actually save you time. |
| 0:17.5 | From startups to scaleups, online-person, and on the go. |
| 0:22.0 | Shopify is made for entrepreneurs like you. |
| 0:24.5 | Sign up for your $1 a month trial at Shopify.com slash setup. |
| 0:33.5 | Welcome to the Kotky Ride Home for Thursday, October 1st, 2020. I'm Jackson Bird. |
| 0:42.3 | Why are people saying there's a black hole at the center of the earth? The Irish Supreme Court declares that Subway's bread is not actually bred, the surprising controllers that the U.S. |
| 0:58.6 | Navy uses for its Subways periscopes. |
| 1:03.0 | And winter is coming in unprecedented winter and how to prepare for it. |
| 1:10.5 | Here are some of the cool things from the news today. |
| 1:15.8 | Earlier this week, science Twitter went into a tailspin when a 2019 paper was discovered |
| 1:22.0 | in the journal Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences titled, |
| 1:33.3 | A Black Hole at the Center of the Earth plays the role of the biggest system of telecommunication for connecting DNAs, dark DNAs, and molecules of water on fourth-dimensional manifold. |
| 1:41.4 | Yeah, a black hole at the center of the Earth, one which affects our DNA via telecommunication, |
| 1:49.8 | and seems like something we really should have sounded the alarm on when this was published over a year ago. |
| 1:55.3 | Well, it's okay that we didn't because get this, and I know this will be shocking, |
| 2:02.8 | but it looks like this paper might be a fake. Quoting futurism. The most likely explanation, according to Cambridge |
| 2:09.7 | University mathematician Sarah Rasmussen, is that the authors purposely submitted a ridiculous |
| 2:14.8 | paper in order to expose predatory journals that purport to be normal, |
| 2:19.5 | peer-reviewed publications, but in reality apply little scrutiny to material that they publish, |
| 2:24.8 | often in order to collect publication fees. As Rasmussen pointed out, the lead author on the paper |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Reggie Risseeuw and Marques Pfaff, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Reggie Risseeuw and Marques Pfaff and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

