meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Breakpoint

Three Scientific Discoveries that Call for a God Hypothesis

Breakpoint

Colson Center

Christianity, News Commentary, News, Religion & Spirituality

4.83.1K Ratings

🗓️ 19 May 2021

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In the book River Out of Eden, Oxford biologist and atheist superstar Richard Dawkins famously wrote:

"The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference."

Dawkins and other "new atheists" have long insisted that science has excluded the possibility of a creator or has, at least, rendered it unnecessary. Turns out this belief may be scientifically out of date. According to a new book, the biggest discoveries of the last century challenge a materialistic worldview and call science back to its theistic roots.  

Cambridge-educated philosopher of science Stephen Meyer wrote two books, Signature in the Cell and Darwin's Doubt, that both argue against materialist accounts of biology. His latest book, The Return of the God Hypothesis, makes an even more ambitious claim.

Three key twentieth century discoveries, argue Meyer, challenge materialist assumptions and point, not just to an intelligent designer, but to a transcendent God. He recently joined my colleague Shane Morris on the Upstream podcast to talk about the book.

Not only were most of the founders of modern science devout Christians, the scientific method itself emerged from assumptions found only in a Christian worldview, such as the intelligibility of nature and the need to constantly test our fallen intuitions against the facts. Tracing science from its theistic beginnings, Meyer shows how it gradually lost its way and became tethered to materialism.

Famed scientists like Laplace, Hume, and Darwin came to believe that the "God hypothesis" was no longer necessary to explain the natural world, that the universe required no cause beyond itself. Given the opportunity and enough time, living things could arise and evolve on their own. Since the conditions for life were simple and the universe had existed from eternity, here we are.

These assumptions went largely unchallenged until the twentieth century. However, breakthroughs in astronomy, physics, and biology began to undermine materialism.  For example, telescopes began to challenge the proponents (Einstein being one) of a steady-state universe. More and more evidence mounted that the universe was, in fact, not eternal, as many scientists had long assumed. If instead the universe came into being at some point in time, it must have had a cause outside of itself, To be clear, there must be a cause outside of space, time, matter, and energy.

Another discovery was how finely tuned the universe is. The very laws that govern the cosmos, such as gravity, electromagnetism, nuclear forces, and the cosmological constant, are precisely calibrated in such a way that makes life possible. There's not a compelling way to explain this "Goldilocks universe," one "just right" that could have been otherwise, within a naturalistic worldview. As English astronomer and former atheist Fred Hoyle put it, "A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics…"

And then, there's the discovery Meyer has already devoted two other books to exploring: Materialists long thought that Darwin's theory was a silver bullet against design arguments. Darwin, however, knew nothing about DNA, the inner structure of the cell, or the crucial role information plays in the existence and propagation of life. The more we learn about them, the more outdated this "God is no longer necessary" hypothesis seems to be.

Simply put, Dawkins got it wrong. The universe we live in has properties one would expect if it were, in fact, designed by a God who had us in mind when He made the place.

As Myer's book shows, this assumption was an original conviction of many who launched and drove the scientific revolution. It's the conviction of a growing number of scientists today who are willing to challenge the powers that be and admit the design they see in the heavens, the laws of nature, and under the microscope. As Meyer puts it, "The evidence is crying out for a God hypothesis."

Come to BreakPoint.org and we'll tell you how to get a copy of Stephen Meyer's The Return of the God Hypothesis. We'll also link you to his conversation with Shane Morris on the Upstream podcast.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Many people claim that science in the 19th century made the belief in God unnecessary,

0:05.0

but increasingly we're finding that science in the 20th and 21st century is bringing God back.

0:11.0

For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street. This is Breakpoint.

0:15.9

In his book, River Out of Eden, Oxford biologist and new atheist superstar Richard Dawkins famously wrote

0:22.4

this. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we'd expect if there is at bottom,

0:28.3

no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless, indifference. See, Dawkins

0:35.4

and other new atheists have long insisted that science has excluded the

0:39.1

possibility of a creator, or at least has rendered the whole idea unnecessary. But as it turns out,

0:46.1

that belief might be the one that is scientifically out of date. According to a new book,

0:51.4

the biggest discoveries of the last century challenge a materialistic

0:55.3

worldview and explanation for the world and call science back to its theistic roots.

1:00.6

Cambridge-educated philosopher of science Stephen Meyer has previously written two books,

1:05.9

Signature in the Cell and Darwin's Doubt, both argue against materialistic explanations for what we know in biology.

1:14.1

His latest book is the return of the God hypothesis, and it makes an even more ambitious claim.

1:20.6

There were three key 20th century discoveries, Myers argues, that challenge the materialistic

1:26.4

assumptions so prevalent in much of science and point not just to an

1:31.8

intelligent designer, but to a transcendent god. He recently joined my colleague Shane Morris on the

1:37.4

upstream podcast to talk about the new book. Not only were many of the founders of modern science

1:42.5

devout Christians, the scientific method

1:44.8

itself emerged from assumptions that can only be grounded in a Christian worldview,

1:49.7

assumptions like the intelligibility of nature and the need to constantly test our fallen

1:54.6

intuitions and assumptions against the facts.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.