Good evening you are listening to Three Moves Head, and I'm your host, Rob Zakeney.

Joining me today is Three MoZ founder, Troy Goodfellow. Troy, welcome to the show.

I am very happy to be here to finally talk again about a game I could not talk about for a long time.

And we also welcome our buddy, my colleague from PC Games-N, and freelance writer Fraser Brown.

How do you?

So tonight we're going to be revisiting the war game series again as they just released another installment of Wargame Wargame Red

Dragon, a new sequel of sorts that expands the action to East Asia and the Pacific Theater

and gives us a bunch of new conflicts and armies

to play around with and most significantly of course naval warfare uh so before we get into all

that though Fraser Troy and I have both talked about uh war game the war game series in the past

people know that we like it uh. What's your relationship with this

series and where do you stand on, where do you stand on Red Dragon? Well, I didn't play much

European escalation, but I really got into, I've forgotten the name of the bloody sequel. Airland

Battle. It's a terrible name. Who can remember it? It is so weird. They are all terrible names. Rid Dragons is the best name. But Airland Battle is just so strange and it's so annoying to format when you're writing a review. It's like Air, then Big El, but one word, battle. It's frustrating. But yeah, I really liked it. I liked it and I liked the way they dealt with the air combat especially

the way it was kind of separated and you didn't have like airports just on the front lines

inexplicably clearly going to be destroyed very quickly but most of all I really got into

the multiplayer the huge 10v10 battles,

which were just absurd over huge battlefields, so much cooperation needed, very intimidating.

And I like how I kind of suck at it. I'm absolutely terrible.

And it seems I've only been getting worse with Red Dragon

which seems to be more of, it feels like an expansion,

not even a standalone expansion,

...