from the age of big brother. If they want to get you, they'll get you.

DNSA specifically targets the communications of every one. They're collecting your communications.

Hello everybody, welcome to episode three of Thought Primes joining us tonight is Jack

so big Andrew pull that and Blake, not Blake, you're famous now. Congratulations. There's no escaping it.

And it is I'm honored to be here and I'm in a much better place than I was 48 hours ago.

I had some sort of loose a fairy and digestive attack for all of you that have dealt with some form of stomach flu.

That's a unique form of torture, but I'm doing a lot better and I just want to say I thank fly-in for the pearly perkshow day team same team, but specifically Andrew and Blake and all of them who stepped up when I literally could not host yesterday.

And it was great. But thank you guys for that and there's a lot of news to cover. I want to say thank you for those you watching on rumble chat.

We are going to engage with you throughout the evening also text this link to your friends. We stream exclusively on rumble because they are the home free speech.

And we're able to say things here on rumble that we're not able to say on other platforms. You can also email us directly free to met charliekirk.com as we proceed throughout the evening.

Affirmative action six three decision Blake, why don't you kick us off tonight?

All right. Yes. So we had the decision came down today in students for fair admissions versus Harvard, which has been warming its way through the federal court system seemingly since like the start of the Trump administration.

It's been going a long time. And this was the case that was brought by a coalition of it was a lot of like pro Asian activists about the fact that Harvard has like very blatant anti Asian discrimination.

And as well as anti white discrimination in its admissions process. And so the decision finally came down today. It was a six three decision written by Justice Roberts where he said it was evaluating the admissions policies at Harvard and at the University of North Carolina.

And I found that both of them were just a rule that both of them were unconstitutional. So it took us at least a step closer to actually declaring affirmative action explicitly unconstitutional, although Roberts kind of pulls his punch where he says, well, you know, you can evaluate race as an individual matter.

So Harvard has already come out saying like, oh, we're still going to use we're going to use all of these essays to evaluate people and you know, to tease out, you know, what their what their race is. They're already making plans about that. But it's still a big step forward, which you can tell just from how berserk.

So you said, oh, my orin, Katangi Brown Jackson are in their dissents where they just absolutely lose their minds at the prospect of affirmative action going away. And same thing with a lot of people on Twitter. So that's probably the best sign that today's decision was a very good one.

Andrew.

Well, I mean, I you know, we talked about this on our show and I'm curious about Jack's perspective here. But I mean, I give this like a C minus. I think Blake gave it a B minus.

And Charlie, you gave it a D. It was it was actually surprising that Blake was the most positive on it. I mean, I look at this and instantly I looked at Roberts squishy words here.

And we predicted that it was just going to they're just going to find another way to institute the racism regime into college admissions. I mean, is it a better world that we're living in today than we were yesterday? Is it a more fair world? Yeah.

But it really could have been an opportunity for the Supreme Court to completely nuke affirmative action. And now Harvard's basically doing this. If you could throw up though, however, the 99.

...