meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Thomas Again Urges Supreme Court to Address Qualified Immunity

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 7 July 2021

⏱️ 9 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A case of university led prior restraint spurred Clarence Thomas to urge his fellow justices to take up a case regarding qualified immunity. Jay Schweikert details the case.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Wednesday, July 7th, 2021.

0:07.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:08.0

The Supreme Court's term is over, but on the way out, Justice Clarence Thomas made a point of suggesting that the High Court

0:14.0

revisit the doctrine of qualified immunity.

0:16.9

Cato's J. Schweiker says it's a welcome statement, but so far Thomas is the only member of

0:21.6

the court to repeatedly urge that the doctrine be

0:24.2

revisited. We spoke yesterday. This case is Hogarth versus Rhodes and the

0:30.3

issue in this case was the application of a public university's so-called free speech

0:36.4

policies to students that wanted to start a turning point USA chapter at their school. And these students set up a table on campus at a little space

0:47.1

off of a walkway leading up to the student union so that people could come speak with

0:51.1

them about the group if they were interested. But a university police officer

0:55.6

arrived and told them they had to take down their table and ultimately they were told that

1:01.2

they needed to get permission from the school to set up a table anywhere on campus and

1:09.1

that if they wanted to speak in one of the designated free speech areas they had to register those 72 hours in advance.

1:17.6

And so they brought a Section 1983 claim against the university officials claiming obviously

1:22.2

that this was a violation of their First Amendment rights. against the which is sort of the quintessential First Amendment violation having to ask the government

1:35.6

permission before you are allowed to speak.

1:39.1

And the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that indeed this did violate the student's First Amendment rights.

1:45.0

But they nevertheless granted the university officials qualified immunity because they held that it was not clearly established in their circuit whether a school imposing this sort of free speech policy was definitely unconstitutional.

2:00.0

And just last week, the Supreme Court declined to hear that case so that decision will

2:06.0

stand. All right so that's all prologue to the fact that Justice Thomas wrote

2:11.8

separately after the Supreme Court chose not to hear this case,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.