With a one-minute look at culture from a Christian worldview, I'm John Stonestreet with the point.

The day after President Trump took office in 2017, the first-ever women's march flooded

the streets of Washington, D.C.

Organizers said they wanted to remind Trump, who made many lute and derogatory comments

about women during his career in campaign, that women deserve respect.

Well, fast-forward five years, and the women's march has made it clear that it supports only

some women.

Recently, the women's march organization tweeted this,

we're not just pro-choice, we're proudly unapologetically pro-abortion.

It's a shocking stance, but not really surprising, given that just days after the first women's

march, organizers announced pro-life women were no longer welcome at future events.

And women's march that truly wants women to be respected and heard is legitimate, even

noble.

But how can a group call itself a women's march when it excludes women who don't tow

a particular political line?

When they call for violence against women not yet born, or for that matter, when asked

aren't even able to define what a woman is.

The Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street.