The “Wickedly Talented Adele Dazeem” Edition
Rational Security
The Lawfare Institute
4.8 • 2K Ratings
🗓️ 16 March 2023
⏱️ 71 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott were joined for a special episode by the most glamorous of RatSec co-hosts emeritus, Shane Harris, to hand out some Academy Awards for events in national security over the past year.
The nominees include:
For “Best Make-Up” (i.e., what was the year’s most memorable apology?):
- The Biden administration’s confession that its balloon bombardment was a bust;
- Kevin McCarthy’s ongoing Mar-a-Lago mea culpa;
- Former British Prime Minister Liz Truss’s resignation over her positively wilting economic plan.
For “Best Score” (i.e., who came away as the year’s most unexpected winner?):
- Western Europe, whose uncharacteristic balminess helped it weather the winter without Russian energy imports;
- The F-22, which got its first kill (of a Chinese spy balloon) even as the U.S. military debates whether to discontinue it;
- China, whose late role in the Saudi-Iran rapprochement allowed it to seize much of the credit.
For “Best Supporting Actor” (non-state actor, that is) (i.e., which non-governmental figure had the most oversized role on the national security stage this year?):
- Comic book villain Elon Musk;
- Manic pixie jury foreperson Emily Kohrs;
- Tucker Carlson, the only man who has gotten less credible since he stopped wearing a bowtie.
For “Best Actor” (i.e., which world leader left their mark on the world stage this past year?):
- Volodymyr Zelensky, the man who stayed;
- Vladimir Putin, who seems intent on doubling down on his failing gambit in Ukraine;
- Xi Jinping, who locked down his control of the Chinese Communist Party—but perhaps not the Chinese people.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | But for real, at work, we call it chaining. |
| 0:02.7 | It's the goal is to see how long I can convince you |
| 0:05.8 | whatever plausible but basic, |
| 0:09.1 | ridiculous story I'm telling is actually not true. |
| 0:13.6 | And like I've let people on in slack rooms for a while. |
| 0:16.5 | It's the best chaining. |
| 0:19.4 | What's that you've done? |
| 0:21.1 | Oh, you would have to ask me that. |
| 0:23.4 | I'm sure it was something about like somebody |
| 0:25.9 | who was being fired or hired. |
| 0:27.8 | Like there's something some outrageous personnel issue |
| 0:30.2 | or something like this. |
| 0:31.0 | People were being like, what, what do you mean? |
| 0:33.4 | We accidentally reported that George W. Bush is dead |
| 0:36.3 | or something like that. |
| 0:37.9 | You could not, not example because you could actually |
| 0:40.4 | go check our website and probably that would be on the website. |
| 0:43.6 | But you know, like little things like that that are something. |
| 0:45.6 | But I've actually had people going for quite some time |
| 0:47.8 | and been very angry. |
| 0:49.4 | But then people try and do it too. |
| 0:52.2 | And then it became known as chaining in our little group. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Lawfare Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Lawfare Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

