It is this primal desire as individuals that we should be meted out an equal proportion

as our siblings.

And what I'm thinking of, like, let's go to something really primitive, like a bird,

you know, feeding the infants in the nest, right?

Or feeding the hatchlings in the nest.

So, I mean, there is a deep sense of injustice at the level of the reptilian brain

if someone else was given something and you weren't.

And I think this is just a classic amygdala hijack is that, hey, there was this distribution process.

This is again how this idea of the system being rigged or fixed comes in, which is another falsehood that we've attacked in the past, is that there was a distribution and you weren't in on it.

And then, yeah, people are going to be met.

And I think what Seoul is showing is that people's political energies,

their animus is harnessed through their economic ignorance.

Because this argument gets passed around.

Like, well, redistribution doesn't mean anything because there was no distribution in the first place.

But if I can tick people off, if I can take people off and suggest that somebody got a bigger distribution, you need it.

Then I can get them to vote for me.

And all of my interventionist policies, consequences

be damned.

Very, very, kind of like see through this problem, but there's just not really a good way

other than Bitcoin, right?

Give people recourse to some form of wealth that can't be redistributed.

Yeah. to some form of wealth that can't be redistributed. Hey, everybody. Welcome to The What Is Money Show. I am thrilled to have you here joining me on my mission to help shine light on the collection of money.

...