Thanks for listening to the Von Hesler Doctrine Podcast.

Remember, you can hear the show every weekday from 9 to noon right here on 95.5 WSB, Atlanta's News and Talk.

I guess it's the very end of hour two of the Von Hessler Doctrine, but here we are.

I hope everybody's enjoying the latest dog and pony show out of Washington, D.C.

Let's just keep on.

Let's do this for eight hours or ten hours or fifteen hours.

When we know for a fact, everyone who thought he should be impeached before it started is still going to think he should be impeached.

And everyone who didn't think he should be impeached is still going to think that he

shouldn't be impeached.

Eric, that's an argument of executive privilege, sir.

Yes. You had that little bit, I wanted very quickly back, and this is

very early on, and I knew exactly how this one was going to go, because you got like basically a,

you know, military guy, he's a buy-the-books kind of a guy, and he's just going to stay with what he

knows, and then you've got Democrats trying to get him to say what they want him to say,

and it ends up in this weird little thing here.

Can we agree that it was urgent while that aid was being withheld?

There's two, there are two things.

I'm talking about the lay, the common understanding of what urgent means, because Inspector General said, this was urgent, not only in the statutory meaning, this was urgent, as everyone understands that term.

Can we agree that it was meaning, this was urgent, as everyone understands that term. Can we agree

that it was urgent? It was urgent and important, but my job as the director of national intelligence

was to comply with the Whistleblower Protection Act and adhere to the definition of urgent

concern, which is a legal term. Uh, yeah, it's concern, which is a legal term.

...