meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
DINESH Podcast

THE VERDICT

DINESH Podcast

Salem Podcast Network

News, News Commentary, Politics

4.76.8K Ratings

🗓️ 21 April 2021

⏱️ 62 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this episode Dinesh candidly assesses the Derek Chauvin verdict, contrasting the media hoopla about racism and systematic police injustice with what was shown in the trial itself. Dinesh comes to the defense of Richard Dawkins—biologist and atheist—who was canceled by the American Humanist Association.  And Dinesh is joined by conservative activist Scott Presler.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Why I'm not cheering the Derek Chauvin verdict and why the two main themes of all the media coverage,

0:08.0

racism and police suppression were actually refuted both by the trial and by the jury.

0:17.0

This is the Dinesh D'Souza podcast.

0:30.0

America needs this voice. The times are crazy. And the time of confusion, division and lies.

0:37.0

We need a brave voice of reason, understanding and truth. This is the Dinesh D'Souza podcast.

0:49.0

A lot of people are cheering wildly at the Derek Chauvin murder verdict.

0:56.0

Kabung, touchdown, big one, big win for our side. There's a sense of jubilation.

1:03.0

Here's the African-American columnist Eugene Robinson in the Washington Post. He goes,

1:08.0

Derek Chauvin's conviction shouldn't feel like a victory, but it does. Touchdown.

1:14.0

So you get the feeling here. And perhaps if you were to ask these guys, why are you cheering?

1:19.0

They would say that's the sweet sentiment of justice. So that I ask myself, I don't have that feeling.

1:26.0

My feeling is sober, almost somber. Why? Well, it's not because I think Chauvin is innocent, the trial proved that he did nothing wrong.

1:34.0

It's not that at all. In fact, when I going back now several months to when I first saw the video, my reaction was one of sort of almost uncontained fury.

1:41.0

And I said that publicly at the time. Interestingly, this is not a situation that produced some big ideological divide from the beginning.

1:49.0

What we saw on the videotape was in fact appalling. And the only question was, is that the full story? Was there other information left out?

1:57.0

And that's why you have a trial. That's why you have a jury. Now the reason that I am, although satisfied with the verdict,

2:05.0

it's very well quite possible that justice was done, but we don't know for sure. And why is that?

2:11.0

It's because of the mob atmosphere surrounding the trial. It was Abraham Lincoln who says, this isn't the Lycium address of 1830.

2:20.0

And there is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law. I don't think we can deny that there were powerful mob elements here,

2:31.0

not just the crowd outside screaming and being, we better get the verdict. But powerful political figure showing up, egging on the mob.

2:41.0

Notably Maxine Waters. She goes up there. She basically says, we're expecting a guilty verdict. And if we don't get it, guys, go out there.

2:49.0

Be in their face. Stay on the street. Be more confrontational. In other words, cause more violence. That's almost a classic definition of incitement right there.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Salem Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Salem Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.