that qualifies them to lead humanity towards its glorious transfiguration.

But typically the beyond assumes a form that's definitive of deific powers

populating classical mythology.

But it doesn't, it's derivative of those myths, but it is also a distortion of those myths.

Thanks to Kant's epistemological revolution and everything, the world'sitarian cognita,

all those medical certainties have been banished.

And as a result, the new myths that we see populating modernity and, well, in post-modernity now, are myths in the pejorative sense, not myths and transcendence.

Myths in the transcendence or the classical myths always elucidated truths beyond themselves.

So they always touched upon, they always touched upon meaning and purpose that was shared among humanity.

And always, they always just elucidated a truth, not so with modern myths.

Modern myths follow a hermeneutical tradition of Gnosticism, because they invert the binary

of good and evil.

They reverse the roles of God and Satan, angels and demons,

heroes and villains, etc.

Modern myths basically hold all things in suspicion,

especially the literature of reality itself.

And we see this conversionist narrative tradition on display with the various invocations

of the beyond. The beyond, as we covered in our book, is invoked as a wrathful earth goddess

in the, which is a story of planets and the relationship of the feminine to the divine.

The bio and technological singularity, which we see exemplify the transhumanism.

It's reinterpreted as the mere circumvent of a stupid weapon.

But it's basically that invocation of the uh i'm going to try stopping is uh by stopping my video

...