meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

The Tudor Dixon Podcast: The Inside Scoop on Jeffrey Epstein with Alan Dershowitz

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

iHeartPodcasts

Politics, News, Society & Culture, News Commentary, Daily News

4.511.4K Ratings

🗓️ 18 July 2025

⏱️ 27 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this episode, Tudor interviews attorney Alan Dershowitz, who discusses the complexities surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, the legal implications of redacted names, and the importance of transparency in the justice system.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is an I-Heart podcast.

0:04.1

Welcome to the Tudor Dixon podcast.

0:06.3

We've heard all week about the Epstein files.

0:08.8

So we thought we would go to the guy who knows the most, his attorney, Alan Dershowitz.

0:13.4

He's been litigating and teaching and writing about law for more than 60 years, but also served as Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer.

0:21.2

Mr. Dershowitz, thank you so much for joining me today.

0:23.9

Thanks for having me.

0:25.3

I want to talk about this because there's been so much drama about this,

0:29.5

and I'm not a legal expert.

0:31.5

You obviously were on the case.

0:33.9

I think there's a lot that people don't understand about this.

0:36.9

You've written an op-ed saying

0:38.9

this isn't even up to the DOJ that the courts actually redacted these names and they can't be released.

0:45.7

Well, two judges have redacted the names largely to protect the accusers, but also the accused.

0:53.3

After all, if people are accused, some of them are falsely accused.

0:57.4

We have to know everything possible about the accusers. Give me an example. A woman named Sarah Ranson,

1:03.9

accused wrote a whole series of emails to the New York Post, accusing Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and Richard Branson of having

1:13.2

pedophilic sex with young people. She was then investigated. Ultimately, she admitted to the

1:19.5

New Yorker that she made up the whole story. So you have a situation like that. You can't just

1:24.4

release the names of the accused. You have to also release the information about the

1:30.3

accusers so that in the court of public opinion, you can make a judgment as to whether they're

1:35.4

relevant. Not every accusation is true, and not every accusation is false. You know, the Me Too movement

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from iHeartPodcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of iHeartPodcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.