Welcome back to Reasonable Faith with Dr. William Lane Craig.

We're going to pick up right where we left off on the tour Farena debate that everyone's been talking about.

Let's go to the studio with Dr. Craig.

Farena admittedly looks as though he's simply committing the fallacies of argument ad homonym and the genetic fallacy.

But I don't think that he is technically as I think about it.

He does not say that tours views are faults because he's a pathological liar.

Rather, he claims that the evidence refutes tours view and therefore he is a liar.

And similarly, he doesn't say that tours views are faults because he reached them for religious reasons.

Rather, he claims that tours religious beliefs warp his scientific views.

So I don't think that he's committing these logical fallacies despite appearances.

And the question then becomes all right then if that's what he's come to debate.

What evidence does Farena present for these very serious allegations?

Well, here's a video reel of Farena's evidence.

Let me explain what you'll hear. Farena says that tour is lying about primordial soup being taught in textbooks.

About there only being a few research groups in origin of life.

And he mentions an experiment using water and hydrogen peroxide.

And then the moderator, Dr. Guida, challenges Farena on what is meant by functional.

So let's go to that clip now.

That's a list of you and get some answers. So first, the textbook thing.

Primordial soup model is lightning and then a slithering creature crawls out.

And that's what all these college level textbooks say.

Again, no, they don't. He made that up like a liar.

...