Hello everybody welcome back to another brand new episode of Decoding the Unknown as always I am your host Simon and what happens here is we tackle a topic we decode the unknown it does what it says on the tin

Thank you Katie for writing today's

script I'm gonna read it I'm gonna add some comments if I feel like it which I can

assure you I will because we're dealing with did a book predict the sinking of the Titanic and other Titanic coincidences?

Then afterwards Jen are wonderful producer slash video editor or a memeologist perhaps.

We'll add in some graphics and some audio and all of that wonderful stuff if you are enjoying this

show in its podcast form please leave it a review that would be much appreciated five stars preferred or if you feel like giving

me one star and be like stop lathering and get into the content the introductions much too long one star. Go ahead. That's okay. It just hurts my soul.

Or if you're watching on YouTube, like, subscribe, all of that jazz.

And let's jump in. As far as I can tell, there are three interpretations of what it means when people say,

I don't believe in coincidences.

Anyone who says that though is dumb.

Because obviously there are coincidences, like coincidences happen all the time.

Not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Coincidence, you know? God I mean there are so...

I sound like dumb now but I'm trying to think... Coincidence I wanted breakfast cereal

for breakfast. There was just the right amount of milk left.

No one planned that.

It just happened to be just the right amount of milk.

It's a coincidence.

That's a terrible example, but please, I hope you understand what I mean.

I'm fairly sure what the majority means is that coincidences are not random happenstances

...