4.6 • 1.3K Ratings
🗓️ 12 April 2024
⏱️ 72 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome to Beg to Beg to Differ, the Bullworks weekly roundtable discussion featuring civil |
0:14.3 | conversation across the political spectrum. We range from center left to |
0:18.5 | center right. I'm Mona Charon, policy editor of the Bullwork and syndicated columnist and I'm joined by our regulars Bill Galston of the Wall Street Journal and the Brookings Institution, |
0:29.4 | Damon Linker, who writes the sub-stack newsletter, Notes from the Middle Ground, |
0:33.4 | and Linda Chavez of the Niskanin Center. |
0:37.2 | Our special guest this week is Patrick Fry, |
0:40.8 | who writes the Sub-Stak Paterico has been a long time a blogger and is also a deputy |
0:48.0 | district attorney in Los Angeles. He is not going to join us on video because of problems with criminals, which I'm |
0:55.9 | sure everybody can understand, but we are delighted to have his voice with us. So welcome one and all. All right, we are headed into the start of Donald |
1:08.7 | Trump's first and possibly only criminal trial that will be held before the 2024 election and that will |
1:16.6 | start on Monday. |
1:18.6 | It is the case in Manhattan regarding falsification of business records and or what some people call the Hush Money case, Stormy Daniels. |
1:30.0 | So, Patrick, a lot of people think that this is the weakest of all the cases against |
1:37.0 | Trump. So I'd like to know whether you agree with that and beyond that whether you think the weakness of the case has been overstated I've |
1:46.6 | read you on this yes thanks for having me I should say at the outset and so have been identified as a deputy DA that I'm |
1:54.8 | obviously not speaking on behalf of my office that's something they required me to |
1:58.5 | say of course I don't know that I would say the weakest but it's the least significant of the four cases. |
2:06.6 | I think that's kind of obvious when you look at what's at issue with the other three. |
2:12.1 | But given that, I'm used to hearing people saying that this is clearly |
2:18.0 | a political hit job and I disagree with that. I think that this is a significant case in what's being alleged. |
2:27.4 | I think the best way to sum that up is to just quote the judge who has told the parties how he's going to describe what |
2:38.8 | the case is about to the jury and what he says is quote the allegations are in substance that |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Bulwark, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Bulwark and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.