meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

The Supreme Court's Ethics Code Won't Satisfy Detractors

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

The Wall Street Journal

News, Society & Culture

4.22.8K Ratings

🗓️ 14 November 2023

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

All nine Justices sign a code of conduct setting out the ethics rules they follow, but Democrats such as Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse say it needs outside enforcement. Plus, Donald Trump proposes that in a second term he'd launch a free online university, called the American Academy, to grant bachelor's degrees and use the federal government to compete with existing colleges. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

From the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal, this is Potomac Watch.

0:07.0

The Supreme Court issues a written code of conduct for itself, but will it quell critics of the justices and

0:16.1

President Trump proposes in a second term to launch a free online federal university.

0:22.0

Welcome I'm Kyle Peterson with the Wall Street Journal.

0:25.0

We are joined today by my colleagues,

0:28.0

columnist Kim Strassal and editorial board member Manet-Uque Barua.

0:33.4

On Monday, somewhat out of the blue,

0:35.2

the Supreme Court issued an ethics code.

0:38.3

A bit of the statement that precedes it,

0:40.3

it says the undersigned justices,

0:42.1

and that includes all nine of them are promulgating

0:44.7

this code of conduct to set out succinctly and gather in one place the ethics rules and

0:49.8

principles that guide the conduct of the members of this court.

0:53.8

They say that these are not mostly new rules,

0:56.4

and the court has long followed a set of principles,

0:58.9

common law ethics rules, or the equivalent.

1:01.5

But the absence of a written code has led in recent years the misunderstanding

1:05.7

that the justices of this court, unlike all other jurists in this country, regard themselves

1:10.0

as unrestricted by any ethics rules, and they are intending to dispel that

1:14.9

misunderstanding. Kim what do you make of this on the merits I guess what's in

1:19.7

this ethics code and then also the strategic decision here it seems to issue this amid a

1:26.5

campaign of political pressure against the Supreme Court. Well in terms of what's in it I

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Wall Street Journal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Wall Street Journal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.