This episode is brought to you by Vanta.

Stressing over cybersecurity, whether you're a startup, growing fast, or already established.

Vanta can help you get ISO-27,1 certified and more.

Plus, it allows your company to centralize security workflows,

complete questionnaires up to five times faster,

and proactively manage vendor risk

to help your team stay compliant.

Head to vanta.com slash Spotify to learn more.

From the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal, this is Potomac Watch.

The U.S. Supreme Court hears two big cases, one on how much power

Congress may constitutionally delegate to the administrative state, and another on whether racial

gerrymandering is prohibited or may be required. Welcome, I'm Kyle Peterson with the Wall Street

Journal. We're joined today by my colleague

Alicia Finley. The Supreme Court has had some low-profile cases lately, as is more often than not

the case, actually, since the justices hear only about 70 or 80 disputes a year. But this

relative quiet period ends this week with two big cases that could have

significant and lasting consequences for the law and the U.S. political system. Let's start

with the one that is being heard today. That is Federal Communications Commission versus

consumers' research. And the basic facts are these. In 1996, Congress passed a law asking the FCC

to levy money from phone carriers to subsidize universal service. There are some vague principles

in this law, like affordable rates, equitable contributions by the telecom providers.

But the rest is up to the bureaucracy, and the FCC then handed this power essentially off to a nonprofit company set up for that purpose, the Universal Service Administrative

...