all right okay we can do this i know we can do this i can't but we can't it's been almost six weeks

since the supreme court listened to donald trump's attorney argue that ex-presidents have

absolute immunity for any crimes they may have committed in the Oval Office.

Trump's attorney even suggested that a president could order SEAL Team 6 to murder his

political opponent, even stage a coup.

And unless he was impeached and then convicted in the Senate, that president could not be subject to criminal prosecution after leaving office.

Nobody in their right mind would rule in favor of this argument.

But then again, nobody in their right mind would have overturned row which is exactly what the court

did two years ago come june 24th the supreme court is nearing the end of its term and they still

have yet to issue a ruling on presidential immunity. They still can't seem to make up their

minds as to whether or not former presidents possess the divine rights of kings. The court just

can't seem to decide. It's a slow and deliberative process. This has nothing to do with delaying

Trump's criminal trials until after November. The court just wants to make sure they got it all right,

and that takes time. On February 6th of this year, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on whether the state of Colorado

could scrub Donald Trump's name from the ballot in accordance with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,

which disqualifies anyone from elective office if they once

sworn oath to the Constitution and then engaged in an insurrection. Oral arguments on that one,

well, those oral arguments were February 6. And on March 4th of this year, less than a month after they heard oral arguments, the court

came back with a decision that only Congress can enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment

when it comes to federal officeholders.

They ruled Donald Trump's name must stay on the ballot.

Now, that was actually a difficult decision.

...