When you can't quite get the angle, take hands-free selfies with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5,

stand it up, step back, and your photos are also synced to your Chromebook, ready to edit.

The new Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Chromebook, available on Vodafone.

Good morning. Welcome to Axios Today. It's Friday, July 1st. I'm Erica Pandy in for Nile Voodoo.

Today, the Supreme Court gives President Biden a win on immigration,

and takes away EPA power over climate change. Plus, Judge Katanjee Brown Jackson is sworn in.

The Supreme Court closes out a controversial term. That's our one big thing.

The Supreme Court issued its last two decisions of the term yesterday, including one that

curbs the Environmental Protection Agency's power to regulate climate emissions.

It was a major blow to the Biden administration's efforts to combat global warming,

and the implications of the decision go beyond just the EPA. Here to explain is Andrew Friedman,

climate reporter for Axios. First off, what does this decision actually change in terms of what

the EPA can and can't do? So, this decision actually concerns regulations that weren't in effect

right now. It reviewed a plan that President Obama had put in place called the Clean Power Plan,

which basically regulated all power plants in the country and tried to move them from fossil fuels

to cleaner technology. Basically, the Court reviewed fundamental questions about what the EPA can

and can't do under the Clean Air Act as made clear by Congress. On the climate change front,

this makes it much harder for the United States to meet its own targets, because power plants

are the number two source of emissions in the United States behind transportation.

So, if you can regulate them in one fell swoop with the national program under the EPA,

and bring those emissions down in sort of a top-down way, then you're well on your way to

meeting your target. Now, though, they can't. So, they have to come up with a solution,

...