What he did at 16 was really animate the peasants and the rubs and the masses to bring the pitchforks and torches to burn it all down, you know, metaphorically, to really just change the system.

And what I saw I'm doing in 24 is subduing those people, making them complacent, getting them back.

Bringing back in the feudal lords, you know.

Exactly, right back into the fold.

And so that's why I fundamentally oppose, because I don't doubt, is Trump 24 better than Kamala?

Obviously.

Of course.

Everyone knows that.

Obviously, it's going to be better governance.

But we have to think bigger than that.

Second order effects long term. And is it the best idea that Trump is going to deliver these

radicals back into the system? And here's case and point. Perfect example of this. In 2020,

you had like 80% of the Republicans believe the election was stolen

and was illegitimate, and they were right. In 24, it's like 20% of Republicans believe the

election is rigged. Warning, this product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical.

Society, real society, has always stood on three

magnificent pillars, caffeine to kick things off, alcohol to smooth the edges, and nicotine,

which is the true gentleman's secret weapon. See, in its glory day, nicotine fueled the greatest

minds, the boldest leaders, and the quiet legends

who simply got the job done. But somewhere along the way we lost the plot. A feminacy began to

creep in. Men traded their duty for comfort, and now big tobacco sells us nothing but compromise.

Nik-knack raises the old banner again.

...