meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Rational Security

The “SkrillEx Parte” Edition

Rational Security

The Lawfare Institute

Foreignpolicy, Nationalsecurity, News, Government, Politics, Middleeast

4.82K Ratings

🗓️ 30 July 2025

⏱️ 74 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This week, Scott sat down with his Lawfare colleagues Natalie Orpett, Kevin Frazier, and Tyler McBrien to talk through the week’s big national security news stories, including:

  • “Feeding Frenzy.” The crisis in Gaza has reached a new, desperate stage. Months of a near total blockade on humanitarian assistance has created an imminent risk, if not a reality, of mass starvation among Gazan civilians. And it finally has the world—including President Donald Trump—taking notice and putting pressure on the Israeli government to change tack, including by threatening to recognize a Palestinian state. Now the Israeli government appears to be giving an inch, allowing what experts maintain is the bare minimum level of aid necessary to avoid famine into the country and even pursuing a few (largely symbolic) airlifts, while allowing other states to do the same. But how meaningful is this shift? And what could it mean for the trajectory of the broader conflict?
  • “Hey, It Beats an AI Inaction Plan.” After months of anticipation, the Trump administration finally released its “AI Action Plan” last week. And despite some serious reservations about its handling of “woke AI” and select other culture war issues, the plan has generally been met with cautious optimism. How should we feel about the AI Action Plan? And what does it tell us about the direction AI policy is headed?
  • “Pleas and No Thank You.” Earlier this month, the D.C. Circuit upheld then-Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s decision to nullify plea deals that several of the surviving 9/11 perpetrators had struck with those prosecuting them in the military commissions. How persuasive is the court’s argument? And what does the decision mean for the future of the tribunals?

In object lessons, Kevin highlighted a fascinating breakthrough from University of Texas engineers who developed over 1,500 AI-designed materials that can make buildings cooler and more energy efficient—an innovation that, coming from Texas, proves that necessity really is the mother of invention. Tyler took us on a wild ride into the world of Professional Bull Riders with a piece from The Baffler exploring the sport’s current state and terrifying risks. Scott brought a sobering but essential read from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace about how synthetic imagery and disinformation are shaping the Iran-Israel conflict. And Natalie recommended “Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead,” by Olga Tokarczuk, assuring us it’s not nearly as murder-y as it sounds.

Note: We will be on vacation next week but look forward to being back on August 13!

To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

So Natalie, we are experienced some technical difficulties, which may be noticeable by the listener,

0:07.2

but probably not.

0:07.9

I think we are pretty good at ironing those out.

0:10.3

But I will throw out there, you know, we have, as a lawfare policy, a fairly generous

0:15.3

for a, you know, small nonprofit, I mean, in the order of, you know, a couple hundred bucks.

1:12.7

Technology subsidy for in-office technology, we got to get you sharpened. You're off-camera now, meaning we're going to have a lot of awkward interactions. We miss the eye rolls and the, you know, curled upper lip to respond to comments. If Alan was on, we could barely do this podcast, but it's just us. Still, we need it. Now that we have some of Law Fairs Top Brass here, I've been meaning to ask how flexible this text stipend is because a friend recently taught me some of the basics of DJing, and so now I'm in the market for a DJ controller. And maybe there's a law for event I could DJ or, I don't know, I feel like I can make the case. I mean, I think the first question, though, Tyler, is before you even offer your services of advanced DJing, what's your name? You know, Sir Mix-a-Lot? What are we going with here? Such good question. I don't know. Drop your suggestions in the your suggestions in the comments. I always say in college,

1:16.8

I had a bunch of friends I was living with, had a party where we all chose DJ names. And my DJ name was DJ Tanner from Full House. Uh, and so I just took a picture of the oldest sister

1:21.7

from Full House and put it up there. Uh, so you know, it's, it, uh, I left. This is a more fun version of the question of what

1:29.2

was your, uh, AIM username? Because those are just, those are too, too rough to rip out.

1:35.3

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Bacon lover two, two. I'm proud, I will proudly tell you that was that bacon lover,

1:40.6

really. Yeah. And then I had later I had hello goodbye two three two. How did you lock that? Whoa. That one I feel like is really. Yeah, and then I had, later I had Hello Goodbye, 232.

1:44.9

How did you lock that down?

1:46.3

That one I feel like is gold.

1:48.8

Hello Goodbye?

1:49.8

Yeah, it was after a band.

1:51.5

With the 232.

1:52.9

I was the 232 person to lock that down.

1:56.5

Kevin, you want to pitch your DJ name?

1:58.5

Yeah, maybe I'd be the breakfast taco boy.

2:02.4

Something about breakfast tacos.

2:04.4

I don't know.

2:05.2

This is where I've become over-reliant on AI is because now these sorts of tasks I would

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 8 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Lawfare Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Lawfare Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.