Hi everyone, it's fourth organ New York, team Trump racing for what's next after the ex-president's election interference scheme was blown wide open

by a series of bombshell texts, emails, and eyewitness testimony from one of the lawyers involved in practically every last step

of the plot to suppress negative stories about Donald Trump ahead of the 2016 election.

To really understand why the so-called catch-and-kill scheme

wasn't just about preventing negative press. It wasn't just something all

celebrities do as Lindsey Graham tried to spin it a few days ago, we'll get in our way back machine and take a trip down memory lane.

Back in the summer of 2016, in the weeks after Donald Trump clinched the Republican nomination and there's a lot of attention

being paid to what a lot of people around politics and around Trump referred to as Donald Trump's

women problem, his sky high disapproval ratings among female voters.

Those ratings, those low-approval ratings were fueled by Trump's own rhetoric

and his attacks against Texas attacks against Ted Cruz's wife, a Republican

candidate Carlifi arena, was long history of crude and frankly vile remarks

not to mention his flagrantly misogynistic approach

to his opponent Hillary Clinton and just look at how that showed up in the polls for him

73% of women voters had a negative view of Donald

Trump by mid-March of the election year. 64% of women voters in April of 2016

said they had a, quote, strongly unfavorable view of Trump.

It's in the middle of all this that attorney Keith Davidson sends a text to an

editor at the National Inquirer that says, quote, I have a blockbuster Trump story to which National

Inquirer editor Dylan Howard writes back, quote, talk first thing.

I'll get you more than anyone for it. You know why. Now Dylan Howard is

referring to the fact that the National Inquirer was in this business of

...