meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Rabbi Sacks Legacy

The Scapegoat (Rabbi Sacks on Acharei Mot, Covenant & Conversation)

The Rabbi Sacks Legacy

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks

Religion & Spirituality

4.8627 Ratings

🗓️ 27 April 2022

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Welcome to Rabbi Sacks' commentary on the weekly Torah portion. This series of Covenant & Conversation essays examines the ethics we can derive from the Torah, week-by-week, parsha by parsha. You can find the full written article on Acharei Mot available to read, print, and share, by visiting: rabbisacks.org/covenant-conversation/acharei-mot/the-scapegoat/ For more articles, videos, and other material from Rabbi Sacks, please visit www.RabbiSacks.org and follow @RabbiSacks. The Rabbi Sacks Legacy Trust continues to share weekly inspiration from Rabbi Sacks. This piece was originally written and recorded by Rabbi Sacks in 2015. Covenant & Conversation on Ethics is kindly supported by the Maurice Wohl Charitable Foundation in memory of Maurice and Vivienne Wohl z”l.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The scapegoat. The strangest and most traumatic element of the service on Yom Kippur set out in Ahreimot

0:07.0

was the ritual of the Shneese-Irim, the two goats. One offered as a sacrifice, the other, sent away in the desert La Azazel, to Azazel.

0:18.0

They were, the two goats, to all intents and purposes, indistinguishable. They were chosen

0:24.0

to be as similar as possible in size and appearance. They were brought before the Coen Godol,

0:31.1

and lots were drawn, one bearing the words to the Lord, the other to Azazel. The one on which

0:37.0

the lot to the Lord fell was offered as a sacrifice,

0:40.6

and over the other one, the high priest confessed the sins of the nation, and it was then taken

0:45.8

away into the desert hills outside Jerusalem, where it plunged to its death. Tradition tells us

0:52.3

that a red thread would be attached to its horns, half of which would be

0:56.8

removed before the animal was sent away. If the right had been successful, the red would turn to white.

1:04.2

Much is puzzling about this ritual. First, what's the meaning of to Azazel, to which the second goat was sent?

1:12.6

It appears nowhere else in Scripture.

1:15.7

Three major theories emerged as to what it meant.

1:19.2

According to the sages and Rashi, it meant a steep, rocky or hard place.

1:25.6

In other words, it was a description of its destination. According to the

1:30.3

Tower of the goat was sent to a desert desolate place, El Eretzgzerra. And according to the

1:37.3

sages, it was taken to a steep ravine where it fell to its death. That is the first explanation.

1:43.3

Azazel is this steep rocky place from which it fell.

1:47.6

The second suggested cryptically by Ibn Ezra and explicitly by Nakhmanides is that Azazel was the name of a

1:55.4

spirit or demon, one of the fallen angels referred to in Genesis 6, similar to the goat spirit called Pan,

2:03.3

in Greek mythology or faunus in Latin. This, of course, is a difficult idea, which is why

2:09.9

Ibn Ezra only alluded to it, as he did in similar cases by way of a riddle, a puzzle, that only

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.