Please like and subscribe. Hello, Shola. Shola, I was just saying before we start recording,

when the Megan Harry documentary was going to drop, I was like, we have to have Shola.

No one else will do. You are the best commentator in these issues that the

consumers have. They're actually a great number of people who are talking so much sense out there.

God bless them. No, but I think I'm not to besmirch them, but you're better than them.

So, Shola, let's start. Nicholas Richell said what, I mean, I'm not sure what the

pretence of BBC impartiality, where that's gone. Nicholas Richell said, and in fact, I think we'll

roll the clip, we'll interspersion after I've spoken to you. Nicholas Rich said, the allegations

were absurd. What amounts really to a conspiracy between the palace and the press, and that I think

is where credibility is really stretched beyond what is reasonable. Consider one of the things that

Megan said. No matter what I did, they were still going to find a way to destroy me.

Well, the first point, who is the they that she's referring to? I think it is the palace,

but most particularly it is to the press. But the idea that anyone was out to destroy her,

frankly, I think, is absurd, and simply does not stand up to proper and reasonable scrutiny.

But they, quite obviously, are convinced that they were victims.

Well, the only absurd thing here is Nicholas Richell. I mean, every time he opens his mouth,

epitomizes every single thing that Harry and Megan say about the press, and quite frankly,

about the relationship that royal correspondents have with the royal family and how they

an extension, like a PR extension of them. Look, I think that anybody watching that documentary,

anybody with an open mind watching the documentary, we'll see a couple who have,

well, literally just sharing opening up there, I suppose opening up their world and saying,

come on in. Look, this is how we met. This is what's going on. These are the decisions we have to make

...