Welcome to blog and may blog from Dougwills.com. This audio is brought to you by Canon Press.

If you haven't heard, Canon just released a new book from Douglas Wilson called Refuting the New Atheists.

The so-called New Atheists have a great deal of moral indignation at all the evil in the world.

But as a apologist and theologian Douglas Wilson cheerfully points out, they have no moral basis for it whatsoever.

This book is a collection of all three Douglas Wilson's responses to the New Atheists such as Letter from a Christian citizen written to Sam Harris,

God is in reply to Christopher Hitchens and the diluted atheist of response to Richard Dawkins.

You can find this book at CanonPress.com.

The Revolves of the Normals Part 1. Monday, June 14, 2021.

Introduction. I've been asked quite a few times how long I think that our current cultural woke spasm can continue.

The answer lies somewhere in between longer than you might think and not indefinitely.

It cannot go on and on and on because Stein's law informs us that anything that cannot continue on indefinitely won't.

Whatever else it is, stupidity is not a sustainable strategy.

The Left's great naming mistake.

But one of the reasons why I think we are nearing the breakpoint is that I believe that the commies have made the fatal mistake of allowing themselves to be identified and named.

That naming has now happened, it is in common currency, and that means the battle lines are drawn.

I don't believe it will be too long before battle is joined.

So by commies, I mean anyone appealing in any progressive way to the tenets of BLM, Woke, Critical Race Theory, Critical Theory, Political Correctness, the Frankfurt School, Social Justice, Cultural Marxism, Intersectionality, Feminism, and other assorted collectivist ends and commy odds.

Some of these commies are commy's simplicity, meaning the ones running the show, and some of these commies are commy dupes, meaning the foot soldier chumps, and frequently recruited from the ranks of soft evangelicalism.

Why does this naming matter?

Back in the old days when some lunatic economic proposal was presented to a bewildered public by some liberal official, the person making the proposal observed all the decencies, and the people surrounding him would observe most of the decencies.

And that is what normals would look at and be reassured.

So in political debate, just a few years ago, whenever a conservative referred to Gramsky, or to Critical Theory, or to Cultural Marxism, the leftist in the debate could just backhand him and tell him to educate himself, or to do his homework, or to read a book, Boso.

...