With a woman to look at culture from a Christian worldview, I'm John Stone Street with a point.

Imagine that Congress was considering a bill to protect religious liberty and the author

openly admitted that his intention was to allow maximum religious freedom everywhere, maybe

he said he's concerned about attempted governmental restrictions on Christian religious expression

in particular.

Now imagine what the reaction would be on X or what's formerly known as Twitter.

This would surely be labeled Christian nationalism, Congress would be accused of trying to establish

a theocracy.

Well, I gotta tell you, the bill is real, and it was passed a long time ago, 30 years

to be exact.

It was called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

It was introduced by Democratic Representative Chuck Schumer.

It was signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton.

It's remarkable just how quickly and dramatically the Overton window about religious freedom

has shifted in the last three decades.

It's important to remember that Refra was widely supported and uncontroversial up until

just recently.

Christian should not be ashamed of religious freedom, nor should we be bullied into believing

that to protect religious freedom is to force our religion on other people.

The truth remains, everyone benefits when the government respects maximum religious freedom.

For the Colson Set, I'm John Stone Street with a Point.