meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
FLF, LLC

The Relation of the Incarnation to Law and Playing “Judicial Politics” [God, Law, and Liberty]

FLF, LLC

FLF, LLC

News

4.7957 Ratings

🗓️ 6 December 2024

⏱️ 32 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today, David looks at the Incarnation through the lens of excerpts from John Owen’s Christologia and Isaiah 61 to show its application to law and its relation to how Tennessee’s law prohibiting medical interventions to “treat” a minor’s gender dysphoria is being defended before the United States Supreme Court.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thank you for joining us for another episode of God, Law, and Liberty with David Fowler,

0:08.3

President of the Family Action Council of Tennessee.

0:11.5

Every week, we are putting culture, politics, and law on a collision course with the truth of God's word.

0:18.1

And now, here's David.

0:23.6

Welcome to today's episode of God, Law, and Liberty, our post-Thanksgiving edition and

0:30.1

first week of December, first week of Advent edition. And I don't know if it's proper

0:36.9

podcast etiquette to say that the host is really

0:40.0

looking forward to one of his own podcast but I really am about today's podcast I'm just

0:47.2

excited about what I hope will be as much a breakthrough for some of you as the last several weeks have been for me.

0:59.8

I would note that this week, the Office of the Tennessee Attorney General argued before the United States Supreme Court in favor of the constitutionality of the state's legislation that prevents the administration of

1:13.2

medical interventions. It doesn't prevent counseling, but medical interventions to treat a minder's

1:18.8

gender dysphoria. In other words, hormone treatments, surgeries that purport to change a child's

1:24.9

gender from male to female and vice versa.

1:27.9

They're prohibited.

1:28.9

So that outcome of that decision, which we probably will get next June,

1:35.5

will have sweeping implications, much like Dobbs did and overruling Roe versus Wade.

1:44.8

And next week, I hope to report on the arguments that were made and to analyze them for us.

1:51.8

But in a way, I've been doing that over the last few weeks by looking at the briefs that had been filed by the Tennessee Attorney General's office and several Christian organizations.

2:01.1

And this week, I want to quickly review the substance of a couple of the previous episodes

2:07.6

and build on them by suggesting today that our problems in law may be predicated,

2:16.6

maybe, not saying it is, but may be predicated on a very narrow and

2:22.0

perhaps incorrect understanding of the incarnation. So I guess you could say I hope to tie our

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from FLF, LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of FLF, LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.