Last month, a listener sent me a screenshot from social media. It was one of those viral posts that

you see every few weeks where a financial influencer or sometimes advisor runs a simple calculation

showing how much a 1% advisory fee supposedly costs over your lifetime. In this particular case,

the numbers were eye-popping. Hundreds of thousands of dollars, a massive chunk of your

retirement nest egg, gone. Just like that. And the takeaway was clear. Most financial advisors

are ripping you off and you'd be better served going it alone or using a low-cost discount

advisory service. Now, to be extra clear, fees do matter. They matter a lot. And there's no denying that this

profession has its share of advisors who charge too much and deliver too little. But here's the

problem with these viral claims and fee comparisons. The math isn't necessarily wrong. The framing

is just deeply misleading. Because when you apply that same math to other

expenses in life, the results get absurd pretty quickly and the logic starts to fall apart.

How absurd? Well, according to one researcher, a single trip to Disney World when you were five

years old cost you 7% of your retirement nest egg. Your daily coffee habit, about 27%.

And the cost of your parents feeding you as a child?

Nearly 37%.

I know, it sounds ridiculous, and that's exactly the point.

So today on the show, I'm breaking down a very thoughtful piece of research from Derek Tharp,

a PhD who is the lead researcher at Kitsis.com, and an associate

professor of finance at the University of Southern Maine. Derek took this widely referenced

anti-advisor math, stress tested it, and showed why it falls apart when you examine it more

closely. In addition to walking through Derek's findings, I'm also sharing what the

broader academic research actually says about the value of good financial advice and how

...