The Presidential Assassination Argument
Advisory Opinions
The Dispatch
4.7 • 4K Ratings
🗓️ 11 January 2024
⏱️ 55 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | At Barclays, we're here for the land of football. |
| 0:06.4 | We're here for the Premier League, |
| 0:09.0 | and the Barclays Women's Super League. |
| 0:12.1 | We're here for the football chance for giving more girls a chance. |
| 0:18.0 | We're here for the grassroots and all the muddy booths. From schools to stadiums, we're here for it all. |
| 0:27.6 | Barclays, here for the land of football. |
| 0:31.2 | Spark your creativity with the Sims. Sometimes you might feel like you're not creative |
| 0:37.0 | and you have to go in search of your creative spark again. |
| 0:40.0 | Maybe this is catching up with creative friends, experimenting with a new look or trying out a new recipe. |
| 0:46.0 | And thanks to The Sims, inspiration is just one game and one spark away. |
| 0:51.0 | Ready to spark something? Download The Sims 4 and play for free. |
| 0:59.3 | You ready? I was born ready. Welcome to Advisory opinions. It's Sarah Isker, it's David French and we're going to do the oral argument. We're going to do the oral argument. We're going to do the Ninth Circuit on Bonk. We're going to do a to law school or not to law school from a listener. |
| 1:30.3 | And it's going to be a great episode. |
| 1:33.0 | All right David, first, you know what, you're the one who said this to me that it's not being error-free, but it is rather owning up to one's errors that gives this podcast credibility. |
| 1:45.8 | That being said, I'm about to issue three corrections, which is embarrassing and I don't know. I've just been really beating myself up over it. So here we go. Here are the three |
| 1:55.4 | corrections. One, the main, this is probably the most embarrassing, the main Secretary of State actually did state her evidentiary standard. |
| 2:05.8 | She said that she was deciding it by a preponderance of the evidence, but she was getting that standard from the main Administrative |
| 2:12.3 | Procedures Act. standard from the main administrative procedures act and okay so I had said that she |
| 2:17.6 | had not stated her standard she had that is embarrassing second correction I had said that the Supreme Court had granted cert in the Colorado |
| 2:25.8 | Republican Party version of the Colorado case. |
| 2:28.6 | They had in fact granted cert in the Trump version of the Colorado case. I feel a little less bad on that one because there'd been a lot of confusion, but it's still wildly embarrassing because I could have just scrolled up and checked. |
| 2:40.0 | The third scrolling error is that we said that Newsom concurred with himself in the opinion we talked about last episode. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

