The potential future of open-source generative AI
Marketplace Tech
Marketplace
4.5 • 1.3K Ratings
🗓️ 31 July 2023
⏱️ 10 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
There’s a new large language model in town that threatens to out-open OpenAI’s ChatGPT. LLaMa 2, from Facebook parent company Meta, has capabilities roughly in line with big-name competitors. However, it’s also open source, meaning the model’s source code is available for anyone to study or build upon for free. OpenAI, Google and many other artificial intelligence innovators have opted to keep their latest models proprietary. A more open approach has obvious benefits for research and enterprise but can also be advantageous for the companies that put these tools out. Marketplace’s Meghan McCarty Carino spoke with Tom Goldstein, a professor of computer science at the University of Maryland, about the advantages and disadvantages of the open-source approach.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Marketplace Morning reports new Skin in the Game series explores what we can learn about |
| 0:04.6 | money and careers from the $300 billion video game industry. Plus, here how an Oakland-based |
| 0:11.0 | program helps young people get the skills they need to break into this booming industry. |
| 0:15.9 | Listen to Skin in the Game and more from the Marketplace Morning report wherever you get your |
| 0:20.7 | podcasts. Competition in the AI biz is fierce. So why is Meta giving its model away? |
| 0:30.6 | From American Public Media, this is Marketplace Tech. I'm Megan McCarty-Carrino. |
| 0:34.9 | There's a new large language model in town that threatens to out-open open AI's chat GPT. |
| 0:52.5 | Lama 2 from Facebook parent company Meta has capabilities roughly in line with big name competitors, |
| 0:59.2 | but it's also open source, meaning the source code for the model is available for anyone to study |
| 1:06.1 | or build upon for free. Open AI, Google, and many other AI innovators have opted to keep their |
| 1:13.8 | latest models proprietary. A more open approach has obvious benefits for research and enterprise, |
| 1:20.8 | but can also be advantageous for the companies that put these tools out. Says Tom Goldstein, |
| 1:26.5 | a professor of computer science at the University of Maryland. One benefit that companies do get |
| 1:32.0 | from open source is just that by open sourcing tools and participating in the academic community, |
| 1:37.6 | it helps increase public perceptions of their company. So for example, Google has always been |
| 1:43.9 | perceived as a very innovative, very technology-focused company that's doing all sorts of new things. |
| 1:49.5 | And one reason why is because they invest a lot in research and they do a really good job publicizing |
| 1:54.6 | the research that they do. And by open sourcing the research they do, they make really big impacts |
| 1:59.5 | in the academic community. And that helps them not just in terms of the public perception of |
| 2:04.0 | their company, but also when they want to hire people. It's really easy to hire technical people, |
| 2:09.2 | when technical people know that all of the good open source tools and a lot of the papers they read |
| 2:13.3 | are coming out of Google. Now that Google has closed off, a lot of it's R&D because it's an |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Marketplace, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Marketplace and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

